Wednesday, August 17, 2011
Free drawing session, Sunday the 28th.
Peeps, Another FREE life drawing session is coming up on Sunday the 28th at Utrecht. It's free from 6-8pm. Get there at 6 as they lock the doors and hold the session while the store is closed. There will be a nude model. I will be moderating. It's going to be sweet! http://www.utrechtart.com/stores/dsp_viewstore.cfm?storeID=91
Thursday, August 11, 2011
Do you like living in a world where people you know do stuff?
I've recently come to dislike the giant corporations that surround us. Not for the reasons you might think, though. In large part they've created an attitude, automatic to their existence, which defies logic, goodness, and a healthy way of living. Seems, as soon as people think about what they want to buy, they march into a big store and look for it.
A quick disclaimer here. People are more than welcome to make any choice that they want. If somebody should read this and choose to disagree, I welcome that. I am only venturing to prove logically that this is not the better way to live (in relation to other options). Also, sometimes the big stores can bring some benfits, I'm not saying it's all bad.
I would propose to you that the big corporate attitude has given us less variety, less quality, and taken our money in the process (by our, I mean myself and the people of my city). I realized this on a trip to the drug store the other day to buy soap. Inside the store, the shelf was filled with many brands of soap, no doubt, but they're almost all the same! How many different brands do we need a "Mountain View" scent, and "Spring Morning" scent? (What the heck does mountain view or spring morning smell like anyway?) If I had gone and found a soap shop I would be willing to bet that there would be dozens more variety, not only in scent, but in the type of soaps (what they are made of) and they'd all probably be a higher quality! True, it might cost me slightly more, but here's the catch. When you buy something made locally, more of your money stays in your community. You buy soap from your neighbor who makes soap and then when he wants whatever it is you do he comes and buys it from you. That extra little bit that it might have cost my bottom line actually translates into a much larger amount of my total purchase staying in the community and sustaining myself and my neighbors in the long run.
Rough math example*: Let's say it costs me 3 dollars to buy 1 bar of soap at a local shop, and 2 dollars at Rite Aid. Where does the money go? Employees, overhead, product. For a big chain like Rite Aid, of course the employees are your neighbors, so that money stays here. But who owns the building? Rite Aid? Where are they? And who else is in the company? So part of your 2 bucks is going to some corporate office in who knows where. Another part of your money goes to the soap company in who knows where. Only the money paid directly to the employees is likely to stay in town.
If you purchase from a local shop, as before, the employees keep their share of the money in town. Is it a private building owned by somebody locally? That money would stay in town. Do they buy their supplies from somebody locally? That money would stay in town.
So, for every 2 dollars of a Rite Aid bar of soap, maybe 1 dollar stays locally? For every 3 dollars for the local soap, maybe $2-$2.50 could stay locally?
And if your neighbors have more money, then they can buy more things that you make. Or they can help support more goings on in the community, events, products, people who need help, etc.
(As an aside, I am willing to bet that communities that figure out how to all start working together locally will all ride out the economic downturn much better than those who don't. Seems hard to grow the total value in your community when you're sending your money across the globe as everything is getting harder to sustain.)
Now everyone is saying, what does this have to do with art?! Plenty. I would also like to disclaimer this by saying this is not a pity party, nor is this a pitch to guilt anyone. I'm not interested in selling anyone on why they should buy my art. It should be evident. If they like what I've done, or want to commission me to do something important for them, and they see value in it, then they'll hire me or buy something.
So, what does this have to do with art? The same thing applies. If you want to live in a world where you have quality soap options, you have to support the people in your neighborhood working their ass off for the soap. If you like living in a world where musicians play music on the street, you've got to put a little change in their tip jar. If you like living in a world where people are making art, you have to buy art when you're looking for it.
I've been at the First Thursday Art in the Park for the last 4-5 months. Sales have been slow for me but they have also been very slow for almost everyone else I have talked to and seen out there. Everyone seems to be having a hard time. Do people like living in a world where the First Thursday Art Walk exists? I'm not entirely convinced that they do. The reason being that I don't think people think about supporting a local artist when they want art. Just like my first thought the other day wasn't to find a local artisan making soap, but to go to Rite Aid.
I'm convinced people want art. Why else would there be giant painting reproductions available in the furniture section of Fred Meyer, or in the frame section of JoAnn Fabrics? How about this? http://www.ikea.com/us/en/catalog/products/30173216 You can buy a giant picture at Ikea for $150. You know what else you could do with $150 bucks? Hire a local photographer to take a photo (of anything you want) for you and print it out! If you spend $150 bucks at Ikea, how much of that stays in your community (and if you buy it off of the website, the answer is only a fraction of what they paid the guy who delievered it)?
If you're a unique person living in your own space that is any way that you want it, why would you ever hang up something generic? At the Art Walk, I know there is several photographers selling prints of their work for under $50. Easily competitive with anything you could buy at Wal Mart or Target. If you wanted a painting or drawing on your wall, wouldn't a painting or drawing of a subject that is emotionally close to you be many times more powerful than anything some yokel rips off of an industrial printer in God knows where?? Why wouldn't people prefer an original work of art?? So why was I inclined to behave this way? Why are we, in general, inclined to believe this way?
Is it really worth a few dollars here and there to cheat yourself out of a quality product, more options, and supporting your neighbors? To some people it might be. That is fair and I am ok with that. But, by and large, thinking locally should start to become a part of our decision making process. I don't know about you but I want to live in a world where my neighbors are craftsmen and musicians. I want to live in a place around creative and industrial people who create quality goods and services. This means that I have to consider looking for somebody locally who produces a good or service that I want. At least consider buying your food from a local farmer at a farmers market, rather than QFC. Consider looking for a soap shop next time you need soap, rather than Rite Aid. Consider hiring skilled neighbor for a small job, rather than phoning the catch-all corporation who dispatches the worker. Next time you want something to hang on your wall consider hiring an artist to make something exactly like what you want, rather than buying a generic something or other screened off by a department store.
The title of this post is maybe a bit misleading. Regardless of the choice you make, people in the world will be making stuff (and you'll know they're from taiwan). Whether they're in your community, whether the stuff is any good, and whether you have any choices are the real things you can impact with the way you behave.
So if you want your neighbors to do things, you've got to support them when they do (and when it fits into the kinds of things you're looking for). Next time you're looking for something, start by looking for somebody in your community who provides that good or service.
*I went to art school. All math guaranteed to not be completely accurate
One example of something local to support if you're into it - The Maple Valley Creative Arts Center is putting on a play by local poet/playwright Ed Corrigan called "The Ave". It's about a homeless woman on the Ave, up in the U-dist by UW. Local play by local peeps about local things. All proceeds benefit the Arts Center, which is a non profit that promotes art in the area. http://www.maplevalleyarts.com/content.aspx?page_id=5&club_id=181069&item_id=17234
You could spend the same amount of money one night going to a movie and get some generic experience. Or you can spend your money watching local peeps do something original that you'll never see again, and support your community at the same time. Choice is yours. Maybe I'll see some of you at the play on the 18th!
A quick disclaimer here. People are more than welcome to make any choice that they want. If somebody should read this and choose to disagree, I welcome that. I am only venturing to prove logically that this is not the better way to live (in relation to other options). Also, sometimes the big stores can bring some benfits, I'm not saying it's all bad.
I would propose to you that the big corporate attitude has given us less variety, less quality, and taken our money in the process (by our, I mean myself and the people of my city). I realized this on a trip to the drug store the other day to buy soap. Inside the store, the shelf was filled with many brands of soap, no doubt, but they're almost all the same! How many different brands do we need a "Mountain View" scent, and "Spring Morning" scent? (What the heck does mountain view or spring morning smell like anyway?) If I had gone and found a soap shop I would be willing to bet that there would be dozens more variety, not only in scent, but in the type of soaps (what they are made of) and they'd all probably be a higher quality! True, it might cost me slightly more, but here's the catch. When you buy something made locally, more of your money stays in your community. You buy soap from your neighbor who makes soap and then when he wants whatever it is you do he comes and buys it from you. That extra little bit that it might have cost my bottom line actually translates into a much larger amount of my total purchase staying in the community and sustaining myself and my neighbors in the long run.
Rough math example*: Let's say it costs me 3 dollars to buy 1 bar of soap at a local shop, and 2 dollars at Rite Aid. Where does the money go? Employees, overhead, product. For a big chain like Rite Aid, of course the employees are your neighbors, so that money stays here. But who owns the building? Rite Aid? Where are they? And who else is in the company? So part of your 2 bucks is going to some corporate office in who knows where. Another part of your money goes to the soap company in who knows where. Only the money paid directly to the employees is likely to stay in town.
If you purchase from a local shop, as before, the employees keep their share of the money in town. Is it a private building owned by somebody locally? That money would stay in town. Do they buy their supplies from somebody locally? That money would stay in town.
So, for every 2 dollars of a Rite Aid bar of soap, maybe 1 dollar stays locally? For every 3 dollars for the local soap, maybe $2-$2.50 could stay locally?
And if your neighbors have more money, then they can buy more things that you make. Or they can help support more goings on in the community, events, products, people who need help, etc.
(As an aside, I am willing to bet that communities that figure out how to all start working together locally will all ride out the economic downturn much better than those who don't. Seems hard to grow the total value in your community when you're sending your money across the globe as everything is getting harder to sustain.)
Now everyone is saying, what does this have to do with art?! Plenty. I would also like to disclaimer this by saying this is not a pity party, nor is this a pitch to guilt anyone. I'm not interested in selling anyone on why they should buy my art. It should be evident. If they like what I've done, or want to commission me to do something important for them, and they see value in it, then they'll hire me or buy something.
So, what does this have to do with art? The same thing applies. If you want to live in a world where you have quality soap options, you have to support the people in your neighborhood working their ass off for the soap. If you like living in a world where musicians play music on the street, you've got to put a little change in their tip jar. If you like living in a world where people are making art, you have to buy art when you're looking for it.
I've been at the First Thursday Art in the Park for the last 4-5 months. Sales have been slow for me but they have also been very slow for almost everyone else I have talked to and seen out there. Everyone seems to be having a hard time. Do people like living in a world where the First Thursday Art Walk exists? I'm not entirely convinced that they do. The reason being that I don't think people think about supporting a local artist when they want art. Just like my first thought the other day wasn't to find a local artisan making soap, but to go to Rite Aid.
I'm convinced people want art. Why else would there be giant painting reproductions available in the furniture section of Fred Meyer, or in the frame section of JoAnn Fabrics? How about this? http://www.ikea.com/us/en/catalog/products/30173216 You can buy a giant picture at Ikea for $150. You know what else you could do with $150 bucks? Hire a local photographer to take a photo (of anything you want) for you and print it out! If you spend $150 bucks at Ikea, how much of that stays in your community (and if you buy it off of the website, the answer is only a fraction of what they paid the guy who delievered it)?
If you're a unique person living in your own space that is any way that you want it, why would you ever hang up something generic? At the Art Walk, I know there is several photographers selling prints of their work for under $50. Easily competitive with anything you could buy at Wal Mart or Target. If you wanted a painting or drawing on your wall, wouldn't a painting or drawing of a subject that is emotionally close to you be many times more powerful than anything some yokel rips off of an industrial printer in God knows where?? Why wouldn't people prefer an original work of art?? So why was I inclined to behave this way? Why are we, in general, inclined to believe this way?
Is it really worth a few dollars here and there to cheat yourself out of a quality product, more options, and supporting your neighbors? To some people it might be. That is fair and I am ok with that. But, by and large, thinking locally should start to become a part of our decision making process. I don't know about you but I want to live in a world where my neighbors are craftsmen and musicians. I want to live in a place around creative and industrial people who create quality goods and services. This means that I have to consider looking for somebody locally who produces a good or service that I want. At least consider buying your food from a local farmer at a farmers market, rather than QFC. Consider looking for a soap shop next time you need soap, rather than Rite Aid. Consider hiring skilled neighbor for a small job, rather than phoning the catch-all corporation who dispatches the worker. Next time you want something to hang on your wall consider hiring an artist to make something exactly like what you want, rather than buying a generic something or other screened off by a department store.
The title of this post is maybe a bit misleading. Regardless of the choice you make, people in the world will be making stuff (and you'll know they're from taiwan). Whether they're in your community, whether the stuff is any good, and whether you have any choices are the real things you can impact with the way you behave.
So if you want your neighbors to do things, you've got to support them when they do (and when it fits into the kinds of things you're looking for). Next time you're looking for something, start by looking for somebody in your community who provides that good or service.
*I went to art school. All math guaranteed to not be completely accurate
One example of something local to support if you're into it - The Maple Valley Creative Arts Center is putting on a play by local poet/playwright Ed Corrigan called "The Ave". It's about a homeless woman on the Ave, up in the U-dist by UW. Local play by local peeps about local things. All proceeds benefit the Arts Center, which is a non profit that promotes art in the area. http://www.maplevalleyarts.com/content.aspx?page_id=5&club_id=181069&item_id=17234
You could spend the same amount of money one night going to a movie and get some generic experience. Or you can spend your money watching local peeps do something original that you'll never see again, and support your community at the same time. Choice is yours. Maybe I'll see some of you at the play on the 18th!
Thursday, August 4, 2011
Free Workshop and Life Drawing session at Utrecht!
Sunday, August 14th, I'll be teaching a workshop on the basics of drawing from life. 3-5pm. Anyone is welcome and the workshop is free. Bring a sketchbook and a piece of your favorite fruit.
Then, stick around until 6pm (until 8pm) for a FREE life drawing session! Hosted by the folks at the Utrecht store in downtown Seattle, on the corner of Pike and Melrose!
A great chance to learn some of what I know and practice it out for FREE! Be there, peeps, or be square!
http://www.utrechtart.com/stores/dsp_viewstore.cfm?storeID=91
Then, stick around until 6pm (until 8pm) for a FREE life drawing session! Hosted by the folks at the Utrecht store in downtown Seattle, on the corner of Pike and Melrose!
A great chance to learn some of what I know and practice it out for FREE! Be there, peeps, or be square!
http://www.utrechtart.com/stores/dsp_viewstore.cfm?storeID=91
Tuesday, July 26, 2011
Friday, July 22, 2011
On being "self-taught".
Ever heard of a "self-taught" artist? I have. Ever seen a "self-taught" artist? I haven't. I hear the term used often and I've even heard it applied to myself but I am quick to correct anyone that I* am not self-taught. At best, the term "self-taught" is a misunderstanding or mis-appropriation of credit and at worst is ignorance and arrogance.
I have only a rough idea as to the history of representational painting. What I do know, is that there have been many points along the way where one man took what everyone was doing, built on it, and then everyone did things a little different (until the next innovator came along). Here we are now, hundreds of years later, and we have the benefit of all of this knowledge automatically and without even needing to be aware of how we got here. We have any number of thousands of resources to discover anatomy, for example, which at one point had to be discovered. The first man who cut open a cadaver to look at muscles was the self-taught man. Now, all we do is crack open an anatomy book and the knowledge which took him a lifetime is ours in a matter of dollars and minutes.
Look how late in the painting game impressionism came onto the scene. Vivid color! And now we have the benefit of all of that knowledge by simply typing in a search on google and looking at hundreds or thousands of impressionist paintings. Artists didn't always know that there was color in the shadows. Just look at paintings from hundreds of years before impressionism. Figures emerging from black voids. Was the past filled with black voids? I think not. Artists didn't know that color is everywhere!
And here we are now with supposed "self-taught" masters running around with the knowledge that somehow took thousands of artists hundreds of years to collectively learn and pass along. How is this even possible? If anyone is honest, it's not. What I am NOT suggesting is that it's easy to get the skills we have now. I'm also not saying that these "self-taught" artists haven't worked hard. They have. But they've had the benefit of hundreds of years of knowledge laid at their feet in the form of any painting they have ever looked at in person, on the internet, or in a book/print.
The real self-taught artist would be the one who's work is indistinguishable from that of an infant. How long do you think it takes to be able to teach yourself to see properly? To visually measure distances, perceive perspective, create any sort of atmospheric depth, and understand value, let alone formulate, mix, and tube your own paint would take one man a hundred thousand lifetimes (since, at my rough estimation, it has taken tens of thousands of men hundreds of lifetimes **). Any self-taught artist would need to discover all of these things himself. Since we can see how many lifetimes it has taken some of the greatest artistic minds to make even the smallest headway on a single facet of the diamond of things we now know it is safe to assume that a single "self-taught" artist would have so very little to actually bring to the table that their entire life would be spent in discovery of things we've long surpassed centuries ago. And all I've mentioned are the technical aspects of painting.
What would be the point anyway? To go through the entire attempt at being "self-taught"? If many artists have spent entire lifetimes discovering useful knowledge, why set it aside only to arrive at the same destination after many (wasted) years? Arrogance? I don't understand why anyone would willfully cast aside something brilliant and useful, just to claim that they "discovered" it themselves. Just because nobody can be the first to summit Everest doesn't make it much less of an achievement. How many climbers get to the top and then walk around thumping their chest at having been the first ones to get there? Only Hillary and Tenzing, who acknowledged their ascent as a team effort. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mount_Everest#First_successful_ascent_by_Tenzing_and_Hillary
This doesn't mean we can't learn anything on our own. To the contrary, I think with so much information readily available it's become as easy as it ever has been to learn new things on your own. It's difficult to learn something by taking a crumb of information and attempting to understand and apply it. Incredibly difficult. We're still getting the information from somewhere (most of the time).
I'm also not suggesting that we worship the past or hold as ideal the works of the masters. Our goal should be to surpass what they have done. We should be a generation of artists who all paint better than Richard Schmid or any other "master" (another future blog post "The Illusion of Mastery" Coming soon!). We've got the benefit of everything he knew and a lifetime of our own to improve on it.
All this blog post is meant to suggest is that we stop throwing around the term "self-taught" as if it actually means something really important and special. Maybe it means somebody sat around in a basement for 10 years copying other people's drawings and never went to art school. That doesn't mean that they were so isolated that they somehow discovered, without any help, all of the things we already know (and even if they had, we already know them, so..no big deal). The reality is that it doesn't really matter if somebody is self taught, learns on their own, goes to a prestigious school, or not. All that really matters is the end result they're able to produce and anyone who can produce a worthwhile result has had many teachers. Being "self-taught" is hardly ideal and I would suggest that it's not even real. This isn't to diminish the accomplishments of artists working in the here and now but to put in proper context that the heights we can fly to now are possible because of the artists who came before us and that we should take the very best of what they have to offer and build upon it ourselves.
*I studied at the Art Institute of Seattle for 2 years, Watts Atelier in San Diego for 1.5 years, and Studio Second Street in San Diego for 1.5 years. I also read a few art books, look at a lot of art from masters present and past, and watch a few instructional DVDs by Richard Schmid, Yim Mau Kun, and Scott Christensen. I am a long way from self-taught, though I am currently developing my skills on my own.
**Any mathematical errors are indeed wrong and accidental. I went to art school.
I have only a rough idea as to the history of representational painting. What I do know, is that there have been many points along the way where one man took what everyone was doing, built on it, and then everyone did things a little different (until the next innovator came along). Here we are now, hundreds of years later, and we have the benefit of all of this knowledge automatically and without even needing to be aware of how we got here. We have any number of thousands of resources to discover anatomy, for example, which at one point had to be discovered. The first man who cut open a cadaver to look at muscles was the self-taught man. Now, all we do is crack open an anatomy book and the knowledge which took him a lifetime is ours in a matter of dollars and minutes.
Look how late in the painting game impressionism came onto the scene. Vivid color! And now we have the benefit of all of that knowledge by simply typing in a search on google and looking at hundreds or thousands of impressionist paintings. Artists didn't always know that there was color in the shadows. Just look at paintings from hundreds of years before impressionism. Figures emerging from black voids. Was the past filled with black voids? I think not. Artists didn't know that color is everywhere!
And here we are now with supposed "self-taught" masters running around with the knowledge that somehow took thousands of artists hundreds of years to collectively learn and pass along. How is this even possible? If anyone is honest, it's not. What I am NOT suggesting is that it's easy to get the skills we have now. I'm also not saying that these "self-taught" artists haven't worked hard. They have. But they've had the benefit of hundreds of years of knowledge laid at their feet in the form of any painting they have ever looked at in person, on the internet, or in a book/print.
The real self-taught artist would be the one who's work is indistinguishable from that of an infant. How long do you think it takes to be able to teach yourself to see properly? To visually measure distances, perceive perspective, create any sort of atmospheric depth, and understand value, let alone formulate, mix, and tube your own paint would take one man a hundred thousand lifetimes (since, at my rough estimation, it has taken tens of thousands of men hundreds of lifetimes **). Any self-taught artist would need to discover all of these things himself. Since we can see how many lifetimes it has taken some of the greatest artistic minds to make even the smallest headway on a single facet of the diamond of things we now know it is safe to assume that a single "self-taught" artist would have so very little to actually bring to the table that their entire life would be spent in discovery of things we've long surpassed centuries ago. And all I've mentioned are the technical aspects of painting.
Pictured: The work of a "self-taught" artist.
What would be the point anyway? To go through the entire attempt at being "self-taught"? If many artists have spent entire lifetimes discovering useful knowledge, why set it aside only to arrive at the same destination after many (wasted) years? Arrogance? I don't understand why anyone would willfully cast aside something brilliant and useful, just to claim that they "discovered" it themselves. Just because nobody can be the first to summit Everest doesn't make it much less of an achievement. How many climbers get to the top and then walk around thumping their chest at having been the first ones to get there? Only Hillary and Tenzing, who acknowledged their ascent as a team effort. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mount_Everest#First_successful_ascent_by_Tenzing_and_Hillary
This doesn't mean we can't learn anything on our own. To the contrary, I think with so much information readily available it's become as easy as it ever has been to learn new things on your own. It's difficult to learn something by taking a crumb of information and attempting to understand and apply it. Incredibly difficult. We're still getting the information from somewhere (most of the time).
I'm also not suggesting that we worship the past or hold as ideal the works of the masters. Our goal should be to surpass what they have done. We should be a generation of artists who all paint better than Richard Schmid or any other "master" (another future blog post "The Illusion of Mastery" Coming soon!). We've got the benefit of everything he knew and a lifetime of our own to improve on it.
All this blog post is meant to suggest is that we stop throwing around the term "self-taught" as if it actually means something really important and special. Maybe it means somebody sat around in a basement for 10 years copying other people's drawings and never went to art school. That doesn't mean that they were so isolated that they somehow discovered, without any help, all of the things we already know (and even if they had, we already know them, so..no big deal). The reality is that it doesn't really matter if somebody is self taught, learns on their own, goes to a prestigious school, or not. All that really matters is the end result they're able to produce and anyone who can produce a worthwhile result has had many teachers. Being "self-taught" is hardly ideal and I would suggest that it's not even real. This isn't to diminish the accomplishments of artists working in the here and now but to put in proper context that the heights we can fly to now are possible because of the artists who came before us and that we should take the very best of what they have to offer and build upon it ourselves.
*I studied at the Art Institute of Seattle for 2 years, Watts Atelier in San Diego for 1.5 years, and Studio Second Street in San Diego for 1.5 years. I also read a few art books, look at a lot of art from masters present and past, and watch a few instructional DVDs by Richard Schmid, Yim Mau Kun, and Scott Christensen. I am a long way from self-taught, though I am currently developing my skills on my own.
**Any mathematical errors are indeed wrong and accidental. I went to art school.
Thursday, July 7, 2011
Art with a Heart Gallery
Saturday, July 9th, I'll be participating in the Artists @ Work at Art With a Heart Gallery http://artwithaheartgallery.com/
I'll be set up there doing drawings, feel free to come in and have a portrait done.
Saturday July 23rd I'll be participating in their show all about women. I'll be there with many of my female life drawings. Check out the website. I spoke with one of the owners, Jack. He's a cool guy doing cool things in the community.
Hope to see you peeps there!
I'll be set up there doing drawings, feel free to come in and have a portrait done.
Saturday July 23rd I'll be participating in their show all about women. I'll be there with many of my female life drawings. Check out the website. I spoke with one of the owners, Jack. He's a cool guy doing cool things in the community.
Hope to see you peeps there!
Friday, July 1, 2011
Upcoming Daniel Smith Demos
I'll be teaching two drawing workshops at Daniel Smith Art Supplies stores. I'll be running through the basics on how to draw from life and helping participants learn the basics. Bring a piece of fruit and something to draw with (and some tracing paper, if possible). I'll be demoing and answering any questions, then coming around and helping people draw.
July 13th, Bellevue Store, 10am-noon
July 20th, Seattle Store, 10am-noon
For more info, see the Daniel Smith website. http://www.danielsmith.com/
Let me know if you have any questions, peeps! See you there!
July 13th, Bellevue Store, 10am-noon
July 20th, Seattle Store, 10am-noon
For more info, see the Daniel Smith website. http://www.danielsmith.com/
Let me know if you have any questions, peeps! See you there!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)